We have analysed data on thousands of leases and compared the cost of leasing with alternative flexible products. The results from this approach and analysis are compelling when we include and compare the operational and capital costs (Opex & Capex) for leasing. Many office costs are not always considered when negotiating new contracts for the occupier. Today, the option of alternative office products is an important consideration. This makes it essential for the occupier to be informed about the differences between leasing and flexible arrangements. It is quite common for Opex and Capex expenditure to be absorbed into general outgoings. This can occur without a specific awareness of their association with costs under leasing. Flexible arrangements are largely inclusive of these costs, but the cost of leasing may not be apparent at first. We don’t just look at the rental costs, we examine all costs associated with office space. With our analysis tools we can quickly breakdown these costs and examine their impact in a variety of ways. We look at the annual costs including the capital costs that are expended throughout a lease term of several years. We can also show the cost relationship between spaces and personnel by applying a desk rate for leasing. This enables the occupier to make direct comparisons w i t h alternative products such as flexible spaces. We appreciate that flexible office space is not for everyone and many companies still prefer traditional leasing methods. This is why we also look at comparable costs for different spaces that are subject to traditional leasing. The running costs might be different for comparable spaces, which is why it is important to scrutinise the cost of office spaces beyond basic rental cost. Our analysis approach enables us to do this quickly and efficiently. This is what we do differently for the occupier.